RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To emphasize the difficulties to distinguish between uterine agenesis and extreme uterine hypotrophy in the context of primary amenorrhoea with delayed puberty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among adolescents who consulted with our center because of primary amenorrhoea, from 1997 to 2005, three patients were referred for a suspicion of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome, after ultrasonography had failed to visualize the uterus. The 3 patients underwent endocrine and genetic evaluations. Transabdominal ultrasonography and MRI performed pelvic examination. Patients were placed under estrogen treatment. RESULTS: Endocrine evaluation indicated primary ovarian failure for patient 1, and hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism for patients 2 and 3. Karyotype was 46,XX in all patients. Initial pelvic ultrasonography revealed the absence of uterus. MRI allowed visualizing prepubertal uterus for patient 1, a hypotrophic uterus for patient 3 and concluded to uterine agenesis for patient 2. In all cases estradiol substitutive therapy induced uterine growth and confirmed retrospectively the diagnosis of extreme uterine hypotrophy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Pelvic ultrasonography can be misleading in the evaluation of primary amenorrhoea. No visualization of uterus on ultrasonography can occur in the context of delayed puberty and should not induce a premature diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Indeed, such a diagnosis has therapeutic, reproductive and psychological consequences.
